Endocrine
Perspective
by
GEOFFREY P. REDMOND, M.D.
Past Endocrine Columns
Dear Dr. Redmond:
Many of my clients are confused by the number of different birth control pills
that are available. They wonder if some are better or worse for women who have a
problem with increased hair growth. What are the differences in the Pill, if
any?
There are indeed many
oral contraceptive pills (OCs) available, and their sheer variety can be
confusing. As to whether the differences between OCs are significant, there are
two schools of thought. One holds that since all are effective in preventing
pregnancy, the differences are unimportant. The second school, to which I
adhere, believes that the differences between OCs, while subtle, may be
important for some women.
Except for the
so-called “mini-pill,” all OCs contain two hormones; a slightly modified form of
estrogen called ethinyl estradiol, and a form of progesterone. The latter are
referred to as “progestins.” The pill thus contains hormones very similar to the
estrogen and progesterone made by the ovary in each normal cycle.
The estrogen functions
to keep the cycle regulated, and the progestin suppresses ovulation. When
ovulation is suppressed the ovary does not release an egg cell, and so pregnancy
cannot occur during that cycle: This is how the pill works as a contraceptive.
Suppressing the ovary may also reduce testosterone levels.
The OCs differ in the
amount of estrogen they contain and also in their specific progestin content.
All pills in current use are ‘low dose,’ which means they contain 35 micrograms
(mcg) of estrogen or less. Pills with higher estrogen doses (50 mcg) are still
available, but are rarely indicated.
Pills with more
estrogen are better at preventing irregular bleeding, which – if it occurs on
the pill – is usually very light and harmless (although it may have a greater
risk of blood clots). When clots form in deep veins in the leg, they can break
off and travel to the lungs, a very serious situation. Fortunately, this
condition, known as venous thromboembolism, is quite rare.
Oral contraceptive
pills with estrogen doses of 20 mcg have been popular recently, yet they have
two problems. First, spotting is much more common than with pills containing
25-, 30-, or 35-mcg of estrogen. Second – for reasons that we do not understand
– the risk of blood clots is a little higher with 20 mcg pills than with the
other doses just mentioned. Their only advantage is a slightly lower chance of
estrogen-related side effects such as morning nausea and breast discomfort.
Recently, OCs with 25
mcg of estrogen have become available. These are a good choice for many women
since the incidence of side effects is probably a little lower.
Another way that OCs
differ from each other is in their specific progestin content. Progesterone-like
hormones are the basis on which OCs are patented, and most manufacturers make a
series of different pills with the same progestin. To make matters worse,
chemically identical OCs may be sold under several different brand names.
Generic OCs have become more widely used of late, and those that are available
in North America and Europe are quite reliable.
The most important
difference between the progestins is the amount of androgenic
(testosterone-like) activity they have. The term “androgenic” is still used in
reference to some of the older progestins, especially levonorgestrel, and to a
lesser degree, norethindrone acetate, which have definite androgenic action. How
much androgenic action they have, is controversial. (My own view is that women
already suffering from unwanted testosterone effects – such as oily skin, acne,
increased facial and body hair, and scalp hair loss (alopecia) – are better off
choosing an OC that will not add to these problems.)
Fortunately, the
pharmaceutical industry has made a concerted effort to develop a number of
non-androgenic progestins, which are currently contained in the most popular
pills. The proprietary drug, OthoTriCyclen, containing norgestimate, was the
first OC to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the
treatment of acne, and I was a lead investigator in that study.
A new approach to
hormonal contraception is the patch, in which a nonandrogenic progestin is used.
A new patch is applied every week for three weeks; during the fourth week, the
patch is left off and the period occurs.
The patch is quite
individual; some women are very happy with it while others are more comfortable
with the traditional pill. Both work equally well.
What does all this
mean for pill choice? First, the best estrogen dose for most women seems to be
25-, 30-, or 35-mcg. The 25 mcg dose may be better for women who have had
nausea, breast discomfort or mood swings on previously used OCs.
For women with
hirsutism, acne or androgenic alopecia, a nonandrogenic progestin is the logical
choice: they are norgestimate, desogestrel, drospirenone, and cyproterone
acetate. The first of these, norgestimate, seems to have the lowest risk of
blood clots. However, pill choice, or any proposed change, must be discussed
with a knowledgeable physician.
ENDNOTE: As many readers know, I have done extensive research on OCs,
including OrthoTriCyclen, and Estrostep, and. served as a lecturer or consultant
for OC manufacturers, including Ortho McNeil, Pfizer, and Watson
Pharmaceuticals.
Past Endocrine Columns